Charles B. Dew. Apostles of Disunion: Southern Secession Commissioners and the Causes of the Civil War. Charlottesville and London: University Press of. Apostles of Disunion: Southern Secession Commissioners and the Causes of the Civil War. Front Cover. Charles B. Dew. University Press of Virginia, Apostles of Disunion has ratings and 70 reviews. Charles B. Dew, Apostles of Disunion: Southern Secession Commissioners and the Causes of the Civil.
|Published (Last):||15 June 2014|
|PDF File Size:||9.95 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||12.27 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
One must also take into account the enormousness of the economic incentives which southern slave owners had for wanting to maintain the existing conditions of their society. More moderate voices, or those who simply want to honor their ancestors, are silent. East Dane Designer Men’s Fashion. Take the word of the o men profiled in his book, men specifically commissioned by Southern states e. The great oratories about slave rebellions, the North’s continued encroachment on the property rights of disunikn slave holding South, and the amalgamation of the races, were but the rhetorical vehicle used to rally the emotions and fears of Southerners during those fateful months aposles take swift action.
They quickly became ardent defenders of the Lost Cause, conveniently seeming to forget their warnings of degradation before black assassins and fanatic abolitionists and insisting the South fought only for constitutional government and liberty.
Popular memory is like the postwar Jefferson Davis, who claimed disingenously in that “sectional hostility” would have “manifested” anyway “even if there had not been a negro in America. This is a very little book on a movement that occurred between the election of Lincoln, and the outbreak of the American Civil War. This is a great perspective on the rhetoric that swirled around the debate as to whether the Southern states should secede from the Union.
Appointed by governors and legislatures just after the election of Abraham Lincoln their professed aim was to convince and lobby Southern slave states t This is a remarkable and eye opening account written by a Southerner on the true cause of the Civil War. Dew demonstrates this quite skillfully in looking at a little studied piece of history in the Southern Commissioners. Trivia About Apostles of Disun Harris gave at the Georgia General Assembly.
I even studied the Union’s war memo I was underwhelmed by this book. Editorial Reviews Review Winner of the Fletcher Pratt Prize from the Civil War Round Table of New York “This incisive history should dispel the pernicious notion that the Confederacy fought the Civil War to advance the constitutional principle of states’ rights and only coincidentally to preserve slavery.
To put it quite simply, slavery and race were absolutely critical elements in the coming of the war. Dew consulted a variety of archives and employs speeches and letters of the secession commissioners an appendix includes the text of a couple of these along with newspapers and published primary sources.
The study served as the reason he wrote Apostles of Disunion chharles he presented both the primary documents he examined and his conclusions. They fully understood that only by standing together, did the slave states have any hope of retaining their way of life. Read more Read less. Learn more about Amazon Prime.
Apostles of Disunion
With this book we read the original letters and speeches used by the South to justify their arguments for secession. Not only does Dew frame the debate over abolition improperly, but he cherry picks only for quotes on slavery while ignoring portions of speeches from commissioners that emphasized the tariff.
In light of what secession commissioners said about the cause of their struggle before the Civil War, however, the Lost Cause can only be seen as egregious historical revisionism.
Written init highlights the efforts of Southern secession commissioners to rally the South to secede from the Disubion.
This could not charlds allowed to happen if the peace and economic security of the South was to be upheld. It was not a moral dispute. Did slavery or states rights lead to the Civil War?
Apostles of Disunion | The University of Virginia Press
One further distinction Davis adduced was between slavery as a political question and slavery as a moral question. All of these works look closely at the letters and speeches of numerous Southern secession commissioners, that is, those elected either by Southern voters or state legislatures as delegates to statewide conventions considering secession or as official “ambassadors” from already seceded states to undecided states, as well as the proceedings of Southern state secession conventions.
Mississippi and Alabama were the first, sending ambassadors disinion agitation to Florida, Georgia, and South Carolina even before their own convention had met. Interested in this topic?
Apostles of Disunion
Dew’s conclusion in Apostles of Disunion, that white supremacy was at the core of the ardent secessionist movement in the winter ofis well founded and dsiunion supported by the body of evidence consulted. Jul 22, Vincent Rogers rated it really liked it.
Historians have been debating the cause of the American Civil War since before the guns fell silent to end chrales conflict. Think of it this way: Sadly, Dew knows he is being narrow minded.
Thomas Dew, in this short but compelling book, provides persuasive evidence that the As Dave Barry once noted, identifying the causes of the Civil War used to be easy: When commissioned to make a persuasive case for why Virginia, etc. Apr 10, Jud Barry rated it really liked it. But the core of their argument—the reason the right of secession had to be invoked and invoked immediately—did not turn on matters of constitutional interpretation or political principle.
Fear, anger, racism, pride — all were on display in the passionate arguments of the secession commissioners. There are no discussion topics on this book yet.
Yet as his book demonstrates, the issue that agitated secessionists and motivated them to leave the union was slavery, clear and simple. A brief conclusion to the book offers a revealing look at the post-war rhetoric of some secession commissioners.
Skip to main content.