What if I have a question that is not answered here or in the manual? Installation Questions. How is dms installed? Should AMBERHOME be. This tutorial introduces DOCK Score in DOCK6 and describes the preparation of input Please see the DOCK6 manual for futher details. If you have installed DOCK6, this script can be found in the bin directory. . To select other options, please read the DOCK 6 Manual.

Author: Migrel Meztibei
Country: Albania
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Finance
Published (Last): 17 October 2015
Pages: 381
PDF File Size: 16.96 Mb
ePub File Size: 14.39 Mb
ISBN: 731-8-46459-251-4
Downloads: 50544
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Toll

DOCK tutorial with Streptavidin – Rizzo_Lab

Average docking time in DOCK 4. The grid score improved significantly but the RMSD did not change much 0. In some specific cases, we see interesting cross-docking outcomes that can be directly correlated with what is known about the structure and biology for a given family.

In this tutorial, spheres manusl 6 angstroms of the ligand are used for the next step with one sphere which does not belong to the active site being manually deleted.

DOCK 6: Impact of New Features and Current Docking Performance

Good early enrichment is considered to be important for virtual screening where only a small number of compounds might be purchased for experimental testing.

Schematic protocol for enrichment experiment.

Notice that running dock6 with an empty input file will require you to answer a series of questions. Receptor and ligand preparation protocols were updated, and a considerable number of new systems were introduced.

What the program is doing in the 1st run is to take the ligand. In addition, we assess the performance of DOCK relative to previous versions.

As one representative example from a large sampling ensemble, Figure 7 shows that, when the RMSD restraint minimizer is used, ligand growth proceeds in a highly methodical fashion and without sudden changes in RMSD.

You would expect it to be exactly the same as the original pose. Results for which all protocols yield discernibly different poses are highlighted with a dashed gray box. This file contains detailed information about the spheres, which are divided into 28 clusters.

  6ES7 216-2BD22-0XB0 PDF

The final key set of experiments, enrichment, serve to estimate how DOCK would perform in a real-world virtual screening application. The RGD protocol, however, results in a slight increase in docking success rate with increasing number of rotatable bonds Figure 9agreen circleslikely due to the fact that as ligand size increases, there are fewer feasible binding orientations without steric clashes.

Moreover, Ferrari et al. The purpose of this manuscript is to introduce and discuss several important updates to the DOCK 6 codebase, focused on version 6. In addition, most of the important files that are derived from the original crystal structure will be given a prefix that is the same as the PDB code, ‘1DF8’. See other articles in PMC that cite the published article.

2012 DOCK tutorial with Streptavidin

The standard protocol yields Docking successes dominate the cross-docking outcomes across all three of these families and, importantly, the incidence of sampling failures or non-viable pairings is very low. The SB test set of crystallographic receptor-ligand complexes described in Mukherjee et al.

Here, we present improvements dok6 the simplex minimizer torsion pre-minimizer and RMSD restraint minimizer that have been designed to address larger-than-expected ligand movements observed during energy minimization.

Following sphere generation, the DOCK accessory program showbox was used to construct a box around the spheres plus an 8.

This manuscript presents the latest algorithmic and methodological developments to the structure-based design program DOCK 6. Table 1 Comparison of internal energy protocols to assess pose reproduction in SB Another likely reason for the high incidence of scoring failures among this group is failure to account for water-mediated interactions or solvation effects, which are important to both carbonic anhydrase [ 9798 ] and lysozyme.

As described in Mukherjee et al[ 47 ] DOCK success rates are typically higher when the exact anchor position is known, as is the case for fixed anchor docking FAD and the ligand atom spheres protocol LAS discussed in Minimization Options below. The biotin binding-site in each barrel consists of residues from the interior of the barrel, together with a conserved Trp from neighboring subunit. Ligand order along the y-axis is determined lexicographically first by success rate number of blue squaresthen by scoring failures number of green squaresthen by sampling failures number of red squaresand finally by the number of non-viable pairings number of gray squares.


Then, the DOCK accessory program s phgen [ 4 ] was used to generate spheres within the ligand binding site. Here, ligands are labeled along the y -axis, and receptors are labeled in the same order along the x -axis. The current release is available for download at: In three instances, all three protocols yield discernibly different poses Figure 16dashed gray boxes.

Progress toward improved scoring, however, is observed with each new release of DOCK, as scoring failure rates follow the series In order to visualize the generated spheres, you can use a program called showsphere.

DOCK 6: Impact of New Features and Current Docking Performance

To test the effects of different anchor strategies, we performed docking using the standard FLX protocol and vock6 the number of anchors between 13or all anchors that fit the criteria of five or greater heavy atoms. Following standard practices, enrichment outcomes are plotted as ROC curves Figure These improvements and other DOCK developments were made possible with the introduction of user-friendly forensic tools including growth trees and kanual verbose statistics Figures 7 — 8S3—S4.

To generate the grid we will use the grid program. The diagonal of the matrix, or those cells representing the cognate native receptor-ligand pairs, is marked with white dots.

Author: admin